[Uml-devel] How good is reverse engineering?

[Sebastian Stein]

Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or are
there some known issues?

Steinchen

[Luis De la Parra Blum]

Post by Sebastian Stein
Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or are
there some known issues?

last ime I imported some files, the classes were imported ok (as I remember)
but associations were not taken into account at all.
I think at least generalization would be nice to have, but I dont know what
that means in effort.

luis

[Andrew Sutton]

Post by Luis De la Parra Blum

Post by Sebastian Stein
Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or
are there some known issues?

last ime I imported some files, the classes were imported ok (as I
remember) but associations were not taken into account at all.
I think at least generalization would be nice to have, but I dont know what
that means in effort.

it shouldn't be too hard. it just entails creating generalization
relationships between a class and its bases. i'm not sure how that would work
with the current carpet model.

andy

OT: painting interior walls sucks ass. discuss.

[Jens Krüger]

Post by Luis De la Parra Blum

Post by Sebastian Stein
Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or
are there some known issues?

last ime I imported some files, the classes were imported ok (as I
remember) but associations were not taken into account at all.
I think at least generalization would be nice to have, but I dont know wh=

at

Post by Luis De la Parra Blum
that means in effort.

I tested for a time the kUML but the stopped their development. In kUML the=
re=20
was a good import. You were able to import a complete tree of directories a=
nd=20
you could decide whether you want all into one class diagram or to a set of=
=20
diagram (each for a directory). If somebody may have a look at this feature=
=20
and test it, I think it could be a nice feature in the version >=3D 2 of=20
umbrello?

Post by Luis De la Parra Blum
luis
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to
$1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v?
http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm
_______________________________________________
Uml-devel mailing list
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/umbrello-devel

--=20
Jens Kr=FCger

[Luis De la Parra Blum]

directories and you could decide whether you want all into one class
diagram or to a set of diagram (each for a directory). If somebody may have
a look at this feature and test it, I think it could be a nice feature in
the version >= 2 of umbrello?

definetly... the import in umbrello creates the classes, but no diagrams at
all and I think it should create at least one class diagram containing all
the classes and the associations between them. if it has the option of
creating one diagram per directory, well, thats better.

so well do this for next version,

luis

[Heiko Nardmann]

Post by Sebastian Stein
Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or are
there some known issues?
Steinchen

Is there a chance to use the code parsing stuff from KDevelop? In the end it
would be nice to be able to integrate both projects somehow (kpart).

- --
Heiko Nardmann (Dipl.-Ing.), ***@secunet.de, Software Development
secunet Security Networks AG - Sicherheit in Netzwerken (www.secunet.de),
Weidenauer Str. 223-225, D-57076 Siegen
Tel. : [phone], Fax : [phone]

[Jonathan Riddell]

Post by Sebastian Stein
Who has done a deep test on code parsing? Is it really working well or are
there some known issues?